DYNOMIGHT ABOUT RSS SUBSTACK

Policy proposals and what we don't know about them

Policy proposals and what we don't know about them

Nov 2020

You can’t measure police bias using simple population ratios. A better idea is to check if police behave differently when it’s dark, but this doesn’t give any firm conclusions either. What else can we do?

Well, there are lots of policy proposals floating around that are suggested to reduce bias in policing, and many police departments have already adopted some of them. Maybe we can look at what effect these have had.

Body Cameras Data

Many police departments have added police body cameras in the last few years. What effects do these have, and can they tell us something about police bias?

Surveys show that police increasingly favor body cameras, seeing them as protection from the public and as evidence collection. Police sometimes complain about the hassle of dealing with cameras, and the reduction in discretion. Police with cameras get fewer complaints, either because the cameras cause police to behave differently, cause citizens to behave differently, or discourage frivolous complaints.

Effects of cameras on police use of force overall suggest a minimal effect. A popular study in Rialto, California with a total of 115 frontline officers randomly assigned the entire police force on duty to either use or not use cameras for 12 hours at a time (Ariel et al. 2014). They found that incidents of use of force dropped by half when cameras were worn. While this study is often cited, a follow-up repeated the experiment with 10 cities and a total of 2122 frontline officers (Ariel et al. 2016). They found no effect. (In fact, they found slightly more use of force with cameras, but this was not statistically significant.) There’s some suggestion that officers use more force when they have discretion over when to turn the cameras on.

Cameras show no clear effect on arrests or citations. This is important! One of the biggest concerns raised before cameras were introduced was that police would be too afraid to make legitimate arrests. This fear is not realized.

Do cameras affect the racial composition of police use of force? There seem to be no studies on this at all. This is often misrepresented as proof that cameras do not affect the racial composition of police violence. That’s incorrect. There’s no evidence either way. (But remember we haven’t found much effect on use of force in general.)

Body Cameras

  • Police increasingly like them as evidence collection and protection from the public.
  • Reduce complaints against police.
  • Reasonably strong evidence they do not significantly reduce use force in overall.
  • No controlled studies on effects on racial balance of use of force.

Implicit Bias Training Data

Many police departments have had implicit bias training for years. CBS news found that 69% of the departments they asked already have it. More are introducing it all the time. Does this do anything?

Let’s back up. Do implicit biases matter? Studies in the general population find minimal impact on behavior. People with overt racist views do tend to do discriminatory things. But for people without overt racist views, implicit biases don’t predict much. Roughly speaking, the situation seems to be

  Overt racist views No overt racist views
Implicit biases present Racist behavior No racist behavior
No implicit biases (Is this possible?) No racist behavior

And what about training? A meta review shows that implicit bias training on the general population has relatively small effects that persist for a relatively short time.

Does implicit bias training impact police use of force? Again, there seem to be no studies either way. Given what we know about the general population, I’m skeptical they would have much effect. But maybe they have some effect which is worth their (small) cost. Or maybe if the training is done carefully the effect can be increased. For now, we don’t know.

By the way: There is lots of criticism of police departments for putting implicit bias training in place despite a lack of proven benefits. I think we should be careful about this. Implicit bias training is cheap and unlikely to be harmful, so it’s not crazy to just go ahead and do it while we sort out the effects. (This is the same mistake people made about masks early in the COVID pandemic. Even if masks had unproven benefits, they were cheap, and unlikely to hurt.) Still, if implicit bias training is established to be useless, I think it’s important to eliminate it. This is for the same reason that an alcoholic shouldn’t be drinking “cleanse” tonics. You don’t want to give yourself the illusion of “doing something” to solve a problem when your actions aren’t meaningful.

Implicit Bias Training

  • In general population, implicit bias training has minimal impact on behavior, and implicit bias training has small and short-lived effects.
  • Many police departments already have implicit bias training.
  • No controlled studies of effects on police use of force overall.
  • No controlled studies on effects on racial balance of use of force.

Use of force policies

Another common suggestion is use of force policies. These include things like requiring an attempt to de-escalate situations, forbidding strangling, mandating warnings, mandating reporting, and requiring officers to intervene if another officer is using excessive force.

These policies are all pretty sensible and there are lots of correlational studies that suggest they reduce police use of force overall. I’ll admit I would be surprised if these didn’t reduce police use of force. However, as far as I have been able to ascertain, there are no control trials that demonstrate these policies affect use of force overall.

It would be great to do an experiment like the following: Look at how often force was used in a bunch of cities before and after these changes were adopted, comparing against cities that had no change.

Given that there are no studies on overall use of force, it’s not surprising that there are also no studies on how these policies interact with race.

Use of force policies

  • Lots of correlational evidence they reduce police use of force.
  • No controlled studies of effects on police use of force overall.
  • No controlled studies on effects on racial balance of use of force.

This post is part of a series on bias in policing with several posts still to come.

new dynomight every thursday
except when not

(or try substack or rss) ×
Attitudes one can take towards people who have behaved badly

humans and social punishment

Have you ever noticed that reality has some properties that are quite annoying? For example, have you noticed that some people do bad things? And yet those same people sometimes have interesting ideas? Occasionally, I’ll bring up an idea in...

Sloth was not the right answer

You can have a wrong favorite animal

Once, when I was 12, my parents asked me what my favorite animal was. And I thought: OK, self, what you’ve got here is a totally safe question. There are no “right” or “wrong” animals and no need to worry...

Everything is espionage: Things I learned researching Assange

(espissange? asspionage?)

Who is this Julian Assange guy? Is he good or bad? Did he do espionage? Why is the US so obsessed with getting its hands on him? At dynomight.net we don't like to answer questions. Instead, we prefer to replace...

The anxiety of the moderate

Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence for this to be the moment public opinion got it right?

It's tempting for the moderate to strut. Isn't it enlightened to see truth in both sides? To calmly rise above the squabbling? But there's a strong argument against moderation: Public opinion has been evolving for hundreds of years. Many things...

What I learned trying to classify abortion access across the rich world

Rich countries are not monolithic. However, outside the US and a few microstates, they vary in a limited range.

With abortion in flux in the US, I realized I didn’t have a clear picture of how things looked in the rest of the rich world. When I searched, I found lots of maps, like the following from Politico and...

Statistical nihilism and culture-war island hopping

If culture war is intractable, what should we do instead?

The Guadalcanal campaign was the first major offensive operation by the Allies in the Pacific theater of World War 2. This nightmarish battle ran for six months and—while an Allied victory—involved losses so high the US Navy refused to release...

Political polarization is partly a sample bias illusion

How polarized are we? An overview of what people of different political parties, education levels, races, and political engagement think about politics.

We’re here on Earth for such a short time. So, I often wonder—what do people spend their days thinking about? Judging from the ever-increasing amount of screaming everywhere, the answer would seem to be politics. But is that right? What...

The irrelevance of test scores is greatly exaggerated

Some claims that test scores don't predict college success don't add up.

Here are some claims about how grades (GPA) and test scores (ACT) predict success in college. "In a study released this month, the University of Chicago Consortium on School Research found—after surveying more than 55,000 public high school graduates—that grade...

What happens if you don't fill out that ethnicity form?

Why do you have to fill out an ethnicity form to get a job in the US? What happens if you refuse?

If you ever joined a large organization in the US, you filled out an ethnicity form. Here’s a typical one:

Why fairness is basically unobservable

Why it's basically impossible to determine fairness from observational data.

We want to know if things are fair. Do some groups of people tend to get a raw deal in company hiring or university admissions or court sentences?

The veil of darkness

Explores some natural experiments that try to measure police violence.

Measuring police bias using simple ratios doesn’t work. You can never cleanly separate the impact of race from other associated factors.

Your ratios don't prove what you think they prove

Why trying to measure police violence though ratios is totally and utterly meaningless.

Watching people discuss police bias statistics, I despair. Some claim simple calculations prove police bias, some claim the opposite. Who is right?